Fed says it failed to take forceful action on SVB

Fed says it failed to take forceful action on(Silicon Valley Bank) SVB


The biggest bank failure in the nation since 2008 occurred last month when Silicon Valley Bank fell, and the US central bank has claimed that it did not act with "sufficient force and urgency" in its supervision of the institution.


One of the primary conclusions from the Federal Reserve's study into the occurrence is the conclusion, of Silicon Valley Bank.


Wider worries about the banking sector have been generated by the panic it caused, Silicon Valley Bank.


The report comes as First Republic, another US lender, still has problems.


According to reports, US regulators are attempting to save the faltering company, which was the country's 14th-largest bank at the end of the previous year.


Michael Barr, the vice chair for supervision at the Federal Reserve who oversaw the investigation, declared that in light of the lessons learned from SVB's failure, the US central bank will be tightening its regulations.


He said that "Federal Reserve supervisors failed to take forceful enough action," citing "too low" regulatory standards, supervision that lacked urgency, and risks to the larger system posed by problems at a mid-size bank that Fed policies had missed.


"In light of SVB's failure, we must strengthen the supervision and regulation of the Federal Reserve."


After SVB's announcement that it needed to raise money caused customers to panic and withdraw billions of dollars overnight, regulators took control of the company just a few weeks ago, at which point the report was released.


According to the report, the bank's "widespread managerial weaknesses, highly concentrated business model, and reliance on uninsured deposits" made it "uniquely vulnerable" to issues.


But it also criticized Fed supervisors for failing to recognize how much riskier the bank had become as it quickly expanded and for responding slowly when problems were discovered.

A significant contributor to the issue, according to the research, was the Fed's decision to adopt a looser approach to the supervision of small and mid-size banks in response to a bill Congress passed in 2018.


"In the interviews for this report, staff repeatedly mentioned changes in expectations and practices, including pressure to reduce the burden on firms, meet a higher burden of proof for a supervisory conclusion, and demonstrate due process when considering supervisory actions," the report said.


Staff perceived a change in culture and expectations as a result of internal talks and observed conduct, even though no official or specific regulation mandated it. This change affected how supervision was carried out.


President Joe Biden chose Mr. Barr for the position in 2022. Many of the changes mentioned in the report happened when his predecessor, who was chosen by Donald Trump, was in office.


Chairman of the Federal Reserve Jerome Powell said the "thorough and self-critical report" was appreciated.


He stated, "I am sure that his proposals will result in a stronger and more resilient banking sector. I agree with and support his recommendations to reform our regulations and supervisory methods.

Next Post Previous Post
No Comment
Add Comment
comment url